Never said you couldnt do it Australis, Just stated the way the Nature Conversation does, like I said stupid law, that you would have to be stupid to think of either enforcing or abiding by in my opinion, only stating the facts I know in direct answer to the question. Hell I posted a thread on here wiht 20+ pics of snakes that were in the wild which I also helped the ones that where on the road off. So just answering the question asked
I thought the law was regarding disturbing protected fauna, not photography itself..
And the photography permits were to disturb the animals for photos.
Ive been with EPA (parkies) people while i took some photos of protected native animals
they only reminded me i couldnt touch them, they didnt mind me using a flash either.
As a Victorian I agree. However, given that our jails aren't clogged with amateur herpetologists this probably has a low priority with our legislators.Even so, if they can make a law in QLD that states you can hold injured native animals for up to 3 days to deliver them to a wildlife carer or vet, they should be able to amend wildlife/conservation acts in other states to the same effect. ...And add that the relocation of animals off public roads for their own protection is acceptable as well.
All i can see is if you are making film of animals u need a license. But a tourist taking a picture of a beastie cant be illegal? if it is, it is totally unworkable unenforceable law else the prisons will be full of Japanese tourists with pictures of roos hehe.
But what my original question was about was if you see a lizard or something and would like to identify it, would you be allowed to pick it up and examine. But i realize now that it wouldn't, and all children should be imprisoned as almost everyone has caught a lizard or frog or something hehe. The can join the tourists in jail o-0
Hey Simon his name woiuldn't start wiht a J would it lol, I know one like that to
Enter your email address to join: