Brodie, I am as fallible as the next person and just as prone to getting things wrong. I do not mind being corrected because that means my information is incorrect. I would, of course, like my information to be as correct as possible and I do not wish to be passing on incorrect information, no matter what the source. I see being corrected as a learning exercise – something I value!
I actually considered adding into my original post that if the sizes of the Slaty’s could be verified, then that information should be passed on to the museums, as they are obviously working with out dated data. I went back and checked the four references I used and 3 out four state this is the maximum length or the total length. I note that AROD states 1.3m as the species average. From your validation of longer lengths being common, the AROD statement is evidently the most accurate statement that is closest to being representative of what is actually out there. It would seem apparent that even AROD’s statement needs revision to be truly representative.
As for identity of the snake in question – not an easy one. Body proportions can overlap between the two species. However, the lowest lateral scales are, to my mind, much more RBB like than Slaty like. Slaty’s also have a greyish-purple iridescence on sections of their body under the correct angle of light but they lack that all-over gloss of RBB’s that seems to be apparent in the photo. The head appears to be more rounded and less squared off that that of a Slaty but I don’t trust this photo to make that call. I cannot be 100% certain but I’d reckon around 80% likely to be a RBB versus a Slaty-grey Snake. That is simply my considered opinion.
Cheers,
Blue