WeirdzandBeardz
Not so new Member
Recently, whilst looking at owning a particular species I found a NSW species code for the animal. When that species code was used in the import/export system it came up with the species even though it is not on the current species list.
I approached Wildlife Licensing about the matter, with the hope they could rectify the issue. Sadly they said what was found was a technical glitch and currently there is a ban on adding to the species list, due to a review process. When I asked about the timeframe of the review is was told there is no planned time of completion.
Investigating into the ban I found a link to the independent review document specifying the theorised changes. What really irked me is this document was published in December 2014. I've heard through gossip channels at herp society meetings that there is a planned meeting soon to discuss with people the process, however I'm wondering if anyone happens to have some sort of 'solid' evidence?
I personally find it pathetic they put a ban on the list after the 2014 report and are still yet to resolve it. Up until now I've always been support of the department, however I'm being swayed over to the broader opinion they are either understaffed, inept or overly bureaucratic...
If I'm factually wrong with any of my statements please feel free to correct me.
Cheers,
Mitch
Sent from my HTC_0P6B6 using Tapatalk
I approached Wildlife Licensing about the matter, with the hope they could rectify the issue. Sadly they said what was found was a technical glitch and currently there is a ban on adding to the species list, due to a review process. When I asked about the timeframe of the review is was told there is no planned time of completion.
Investigating into the ban I found a link to the independent review document specifying the theorised changes. What really irked me is this document was published in December 2014. I've heard through gossip channels at herp society meetings that there is a planned meeting soon to discuss with people the process, however I'm wondering if anyone happens to have some sort of 'solid' evidence?
I personally find it pathetic they put a ban on the list after the 2014 report and are still yet to resolve it. Up until now I've always been support of the department, however I'm being swayed over to the broader opinion they are either understaffed, inept or overly bureaucratic...
If I'm factually wrong with any of my statements please feel free to correct me.
Cheers,
Mitch
Sent from my HTC_0P6B6 using Tapatalk