JeffHardy
Active Member
There is another thread on APS about hybridising carpet snakes. That thread has lead into another of my personal hates. Why do we name animals after people, either scientific or common names?
To use just a few examples from the genus Antaresia - Messrs. Children and Stimson, had pythons named after them and we also have maculosa and perthensis. OK, so the first two were named scientifically in recognition of some contribution that those persons made to science. We can't retreat from the original scientific names given to these animals, but why the hell can't we at least use a desriptive common name for the animals. Some people still insist in calling them Children's Python and Stimson's Python. Those names don't describe the animals or the regions or habitat from which they come?
So what could we come up with? How about -
A. childreni - Northern Cave Python, Crevice Python, Small Cave Python, Small Crevice Python or something else that is descriptive;
A. stimsoni - we already have an acceptable alternative in Large-blotched Python;
A. maculosa - what is wrong with the names that are already in widespread use - Spotted Python or Eastern Small-blotched Python - why do we have to use "maccy"? That's not descriptive and only reverts to the scientific name that means "spotted" anyway;
A. perthensis - Ah ha! Common sense at last - the world's smallest python so we call it the "Pygmy Python".
Over 25 years ago the Royal Australian Ornithologist's Union (now Birds Australia) published a definitive list of a single common name for every Australian bird species. Why isn't a similar exercise undertaken for reptiles?
To use just a few examples from the genus Antaresia - Messrs. Children and Stimson, had pythons named after them and we also have maculosa and perthensis. OK, so the first two were named scientifically in recognition of some contribution that those persons made to science. We can't retreat from the original scientific names given to these animals, but why the hell can't we at least use a desriptive common name for the animals. Some people still insist in calling them Children's Python and Stimson's Python. Those names don't describe the animals or the regions or habitat from which they come?
So what could we come up with? How about -
A. childreni - Northern Cave Python, Crevice Python, Small Cave Python, Small Crevice Python or something else that is descriptive;
A. stimsoni - we already have an acceptable alternative in Large-blotched Python;
A. maculosa - what is wrong with the names that are already in widespread use - Spotted Python or Eastern Small-blotched Python - why do we have to use "maccy"? That's not descriptive and only reverts to the scientific name that means "spotted" anyway;
A. perthensis - Ah ha! Common sense at last - the world's smallest python so we call it the "Pygmy Python".
Over 25 years ago the Royal Australian Ornithologist's Union (now Birds Australia) published a definitive list of a single common name for every Australian bird species. Why isn't a similar exercise undertaken for reptiles?