Snakes leapfrog evolution

Aussie Pythons & Snakes Forum

Help Support Aussie Pythons & Snakes Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.

angelrose

Very Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2004
Messages
1,444
Reaction score
0
Location
Mount Waverley, Victoria, Australia
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,11838285%5E13762,00.html

Snakes leapfrog evolution
By Brian Williams
January 3, 2005

RESEARCHERS believe two species of snake have evolved their body shapes so they can eat cane toads without being killed by the amphibian's poison.

The red-bellied black and golden/green tree snake have developed smaller heads and larger bodies. Snakes with a small head can eat only small toads, therefore ingesting less poison. A larger body also allows better absorbtion of larger doses of poison.

University of Sydney evolutionary biologist Rick Shine said the heads of black snakes and tree snakes seemed to have decreased by about 10 per cent and, while maximum body sizes had not changed, minimum sizes had increased. It had taken about 20 generations for this to occur over a 70-year period.

Researchers compared four species held by the Queensland Museum since before toads were released in 1935, and noted consistent shifts in the black snake and the tree snake.

"It looks for all the world like an evolutionary response to a new challenge put upon the system," Professor Shine said.
 
the study is also happening in the NT. they are measuring head and body sizes of snakes and plane to moniter them while the toads are around
 
:? 70 odd years seems a rather short time for physical evolutionary changes. Wow! :shock:
Behavioural changes I could understand...........just WOW!
 
You're thinking in human terms, not evolutionary terms, Inny. 20 generations is a better way to think about it. Ad I can certainly see that happening over that period.

Over the last 50 or 60 years the average size has decreased drastically for many of the commercially harvested fish species found off NSW. This is an evolutionary response to human 'predation', wher the small fish are thrown back and the larger ones kept. Over time, all the fish with the genes for 'largeness' are removed and you end up with a population of smaller individuals.

Evolution in action.

Long live Charles Darwin (or his memory, at least! :lol:)

:p

Hix
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top