BredliFreak
Well-Known Member
I'm not sure if you if you guys get this but...
I find it really annoying when people get their facts wrong or identify something incorrectly (especially animals). I don't know why, but this really annoys me. Maybe it's just my brain trying to put knowledge to use but I'll post some examples so you can see what I mean:
This picture shows an 'eastern brown snake' but it is clearly a keelback due to the loreal scale.
http://www.australiangeographic.com.au/news/2011/01/wildlife-hit-hard-by-queensland-floods
Another example was on QI when Steven Fry said that a boa constrictor was the only species where the scientific name is the same as the common name but I thought "Aren't they called red-tailed boas?"
My final one was in my grandma's old copy Women's Weekly australian wildlife/reptiles and a Central Beardie (Pogona Vitticeps) was classified as a Spiny-Tailed gecko (Strophurus sp.).
Feel free to let me know if this annoys you, if you have seen examples of this or other things that annoy you in general.
Bredli
I find it really annoying when people get their facts wrong or identify something incorrectly (especially animals). I don't know why, but this really annoys me. Maybe it's just my brain trying to put knowledge to use but I'll post some examples so you can see what I mean:
This picture shows an 'eastern brown snake' but it is clearly a keelback due to the loreal scale.
http://www.australiangeographic.com.au/news/2011/01/wildlife-hit-hard-by-queensland-floods
Another example was on QI when Steven Fry said that a boa constrictor was the only species where the scientific name is the same as the common name but I thought "Aren't they called red-tailed boas?"
My final one was in my grandma's old copy Women's Weekly australian wildlife/reptiles and a Central Beardie (Pogona Vitticeps) was classified as a Spiny-Tailed gecko (Strophurus sp.).
Feel free to let me know if this annoys you, if you have seen examples of this or other things that annoy you in general.
Bredli