Venom common, predates snake evolution

Aussie Pythons & Snakes Forum

Help Support Aussie Pythons & Snakes Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.

tourett

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 30, 2004
Messages
640
Reaction score
0
Location
Brisbane
Danny Kingsley
ABC Science Online
Friday, 22 August 2003

Venom is much more common among snakes than previously thought, and its origins predate the evolution of snakes, according to surprising new Australian research.

By personally catching and milking thousands of snakes around the world, Dr Bryan Fry from the Australian Venom Research Unit at the University of Melbourne has shown that even snakes that we think of as non-poisonous have a venomous bite.

His results were presented at the annual Fresh Science forum for young scientists being held as part of Australia's National Science Week.

Perhaps even more surprising, Fry has found that venoms have been evolving a lot longer that the snakes themselves. "Snake venom developed only one time in evolution, a few hundred million years ago," he said.

To test this theory, he analysed the 'saliva' of an archetypal 'non-venomous' snake, the ratsnake, to see how far back venom components started in the evolution of snakes. The ratsnake, which is commonly sold in pet stores around the world, contained the same toxins as a cobra or death adder, and the toxins were just as potent.

Researching snake venom is not without hazards. Fry has travelled the globe looking for representatives of the major snake lineages. In 2002, he milked over 2,000 snakes and was poisoned four times - including suffering a cobra bite. He even suffered an episode of the bends after diving for sea snakes in the remote South Pacific.

Fry was able to use the isolation of the snakes in Madagascar - which have been separated from all other snakes for between 40 to 150 million years - to compare the venoms with all the other major lineages across the world: the 'non-venomous' snakes, the elapids and the vipers. He was able to determine the toxins they all shared in common.

Snakes originally evolved from heavy-bodied swamp monsters, not dissimilar to modern anacondas, he said. To become lighter and more athletic, the snakes needed a new arsenal and developed venom. "This origin of venom is so far back, it occurred before the snake we commonly think of as 'non-venomous' even showed up on the tree of life," he said.

By tracing these against the evolutionary tree of snakes, he is able to present the venom of the very first venomous snake.

The implications of the study are far reaching: it show that the number of snakes containing venom is actually 2,700 - not the 250 previously catalogued as poisonous. And there is also the possibility of new drugs will come from the work.

One industry that will be affected by this finding is the pet snake trade, an industry that is highly regulated in Australia at least. In other, less regulated countries, there have been cases of people being bitten by pet snakes and falling ill.
 
I admire Dr Fry (never met him but I have heard of his work and seen a docco of his) for his work and dedication in his area of study, but is it me or does he seem to get bitten by venomus snakes alot more regularly than you would expect from someone of his experience and expertise? I mean every time I hear about him he is in hospital for one snake bite or another.

do any of you guys who breed/work with venomus snakes have this much problems?
 
Jarvis, it's milking the snakes that is highly risky and causes most of his bites.
 
Brian fry is always good to watch on doco's. Seen him a few times on SnakeBuster, O'Shea's and Snake hunters on National Geo and Animal Planet.The sea snake research he's done is awesome.

Simone
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top