B
Bluetongue1
Guest
dickyknee,
Before I say anything else, now that you have explained the context of the statement, I fully understand what you intended and where you we coming from. I am glad I was wrong and obviously rescind any implied arrogance and negativity on your behalf. I sincerely apologise for any offence I may have wrongly caused you.
This problem emanates from the use of sarcasm and ‘ragging’ amongst friends and associates. Within the core of individuals that understand what goes on, there is no issue, only ‘light-hearted jibes’. However, for those not in the know, they take what is said at face value… often diametrically opposite to that which is intended.
My comment was not arrogant. You could, however, consider it blunt and judgmental. I am no-one special and I simply want to learn, like most others here. And should my understanding permit, I think it a good thing to pass on some of that learning to others. The biggest impedance to both has been negative comments about others, rather than sticking to facts or opinions or ideas that have been posted. I am particularly aware of the stipulations for use of this forum in particular, which is why I questioned the intent of your comment. I will add here that my interpretation was in no way any reflection on your use of APS in general, as I am aware of your contributions (and so found the comment ‘out of character’).
I had initially ended my comment with: “Care to explain?” I was feeling unwell at the time and it sounded a bit too much like Pauline Hansen, so I deleted it. Clearly I was wrong not to encourage you to have your say. It makes the difference an enquiry and an accusatory statement. Please accept my apologies again.
There is an issue with photos used in field guides and on the net generally. They choose well marked animals as a subject. Consequently, we don’t get to see the true range of markings in nature, unless we have extensive field experience with a given animal or have seen that range of patterns in captive animals. It does make it difficult at times with respect to IDs.
Here is a darker than normal version of a Golden-crowned… http://www.aussiepythons.com/forum/...olden-crown-possibilities-197087/#post2285517
Blue
Before I say anything else, now that you have explained the context of the statement, I fully understand what you intended and where you we coming from. I am glad I was wrong and obviously rescind any implied arrogance and negativity on your behalf. I sincerely apologise for any offence I may have wrongly caused you.
This problem emanates from the use of sarcasm and ‘ragging’ amongst friends and associates. Within the core of individuals that understand what goes on, there is no issue, only ‘light-hearted jibes’. However, for those not in the know, they take what is said at face value… often diametrically opposite to that which is intended.
My comment was not arrogant. You could, however, consider it blunt and judgmental. I am no-one special and I simply want to learn, like most others here. And should my understanding permit, I think it a good thing to pass on some of that learning to others. The biggest impedance to both has been negative comments about others, rather than sticking to facts or opinions or ideas that have been posted. I am particularly aware of the stipulations for use of this forum in particular, which is why I questioned the intent of your comment. I will add here that my interpretation was in no way any reflection on your use of APS in general, as I am aware of your contributions (and so found the comment ‘out of character’).
I had initially ended my comment with: “Care to explain?” I was feeling unwell at the time and it sounded a bit too much like Pauline Hansen, so I deleted it. Clearly I was wrong not to encourage you to have your say. It makes the difference an enquiry and an accusatory statement. Please accept my apologies again.
There is an issue with photos used in field guides and on the net generally. They choose well marked animals as a subject. Consequently, we don’t get to see the true range of markings in nature, unless we have extensive field experience with a given animal or have seen that range of patterns in captive animals. It does make it difficult at times with respect to IDs.
Here is a darker than normal version of a Golden-crowned… http://www.aussiepythons.com/forum/...olden-crown-possibilities-197087/#post2285517
Blue