AM Pythons
Very Well-Known Member
its mayfield, ****ty suburb, but a quiet street behind woolies, it was $130 a week when i moved in 5 years ago.. i dont think i could find something as cheap now, unless i moved to maitland/cessnock ..
its mayfield, ****ty suburb, but a quiet street behind woolies, it was $130 a week when i moved in 5 years ago.. i dont think i could find something as cheap now, unless i moved to maitland/cessnock ..
out there they would spot me straight away..lol. i only have 10 fingers & 10 toe's (you have to have 11 iof each to live out there)..its mayfield, ****ty suburb, but a quiet street behind woolies, it was $130 a week when i moved in 5 years ago.. i dont think i could find something as cheap now, unless i moved to maitland/cessnock ..
Nah, we're not poor.....we're lucky!!!
We're the smart ones that realise that once you've got a Dept of Housing place, you can never be kicked out which is a huge worry when you're privately renting. We pay $100's less each week so we have more disposable income to spend on things we want and we don't have to put up with landlords who want to do endless inspections each year and who constantly put up the rent.
My rent usually goes up about $2 a week each year which is nothing, maintenance issues are dealt with within 2 weeks and I'm able to do whatever I want to the place within reason and they never say a word about it cause they're just happy that someone is looking after the place well.
Glad to see my taxes working hard to increase your disposable income... How about a bit of social responsibility on your behalf? I'm sure there are many more people out there that need your house more than you do...
I have every right to live here otherwise they would kick me out. I'm a low income earner and I would really struggle living in a private rental and I would have no security of being able to stay in a place long-term.
I've raised my son for 17 years on my own and the government allowed my son's father to get away with paying on average $5 a week child support when he was earning a large income, so as far as I'm concerned they can now pay to subsidise my rent for the rest of my life.
Hmmm some interesting conversations going on, Jewly if I was in your shoes I would look at the situation as being able to save some extra money for my own place or save some extra money to help your son to eventually get his own place but then again no body can be in your shoes besides you.
i pay $120 a week to live at home , thats including food - elec - everything .im paying 150 a week to live at home
Not telling, the more people know, the more rent i'll end up having to pay.
its within a 2.5-3hr radius from Canberra.
would u recogmend living with ur rents until u can afford to buy a house?
cause from reading this, i think i might do that.
Will
yea I would will, its the best place to save money
In respect to people who are low income earners your only helpless when you deem yourself not valuable enough to earn good money "if theres a will theres a way, may not always be the easy path!"
yea I would will, its the best place to save money
In respect to people who are low income earners your only helpless when you deem yourself not valuable enough to earn good money "if theres a will theres a way, may not always be the easy path!"
yup i agree , my brother works 6 days a week - i can tell u his not that happy . id rather get paid less and be happy . but hey im a bum .Some of us prefer to have a life than spend all their waking hours working.
I work full-time in the corporate office of a great Australia-wide company which is family based and they treat us wonderfully, pay higher than award wages and I have a stress-free job. I know I have the ability to go out and get a higher paid job but I'd end up stressed and worn out from work each day and I don't think the extra money is worth it in the end.
Enter your email address to join: