Gregory
Well-Known Member
For those of you that don't subscribe to australianherps list here is what Jeff Hardy has to say about Pet shops selling Reptiles in NSW.
By August 2003 it is expected that NSW will be the only Australian
Sate/territory to not permit some degree of reptile trade through pet
shops. The issue had been referred to the NSW Native Animal Keepers
Consultative Committee for the earliest possible advice to the
Director-General and Minister for the Environment. The issue was
raised at NAKCC on 9 April and reps will table their submissions and
recommendations at the NAKCC meeting on 5 June. I appreciate that the
issue will be discussed at AHS on Friday 23 May and instructions will
undoubtedly to given to their NAKCC rep (Glen Shea). The other
reptile rep, Gerry Swan, I presume, has or will discuss the issue
with the RKA and HHS whom he represents on NAKCC.
There are a few issues that need to be considered in this debate.
Whether it occurs this year, next year or ten years down the track,
it must be appreciated that NSW cannot remain an "island" forever, so
pet shop trade in at least some reptile species is, in my opinion,
inevitable.
The role of the NAKCC (that has representation from reptile, frog,
and bird groups, pet industry, animal welfare and conservation
interests) is not to determine policy, but to provide advice. The
advice that it ultimately provides, whether or not it actually
recommends that pet shop trade be legalised in this State, must be
balanced and complete. NAKCC needs to ensure that if the government
(the current ban is government policy, not an NPWS restriction)
decides to allow pet-shop trade that it is via a system that will be
efficient, effective and enforceable. Any commercial trade system
must work to meet the interests, needs and expectations of the
general public, animal keepers, the pet industry, animal welfare and
conservation. Would it be a virtual free-for-all as seems to be the
case in some other jurisdictions? Or would it be through a limited
number of licensed traders with access to a limited number
of "common", easily kept and bred species? The Minister's office
expects the NAKCC to provide him with its advice immediately
following the June 5 meeting.
I would be pleased to receive comment from individuals if you want to
post here or send messages direct to me at NPWS. All comments/
suggestions will be provided to NAKCC members.
Jeff Hardy
Coordinator Wildlife Licensing
NSW NPWS
[email protected]
By August 2003 it is expected that NSW will be the only Australian
Sate/territory to not permit some degree of reptile trade through pet
shops. The issue had been referred to the NSW Native Animal Keepers
Consultative Committee for the earliest possible advice to the
Director-General and Minister for the Environment. The issue was
raised at NAKCC on 9 April and reps will table their submissions and
recommendations at the NAKCC meeting on 5 June. I appreciate that the
issue will be discussed at AHS on Friday 23 May and instructions will
undoubtedly to given to their NAKCC rep (Glen Shea). The other
reptile rep, Gerry Swan, I presume, has or will discuss the issue
with the RKA and HHS whom he represents on NAKCC.
There are a few issues that need to be considered in this debate.
Whether it occurs this year, next year or ten years down the track,
it must be appreciated that NSW cannot remain an "island" forever, so
pet shop trade in at least some reptile species is, in my opinion,
inevitable.
The role of the NAKCC (that has representation from reptile, frog,
and bird groups, pet industry, animal welfare and conservation
interests) is not to determine policy, but to provide advice. The
advice that it ultimately provides, whether or not it actually
recommends that pet shop trade be legalised in this State, must be
balanced and complete. NAKCC needs to ensure that if the government
(the current ban is government policy, not an NPWS restriction)
decides to allow pet-shop trade that it is via a system that will be
efficient, effective and enforceable. Any commercial trade system
must work to meet the interests, needs and expectations of the
general public, animal keepers, the pet industry, animal welfare and
conservation. Would it be a virtual free-for-all as seems to be the
case in some other jurisdictions? Or would it be through a limited
number of licensed traders with access to a limited number
of "common", easily kept and bred species? The Minister's office
expects the NAKCC to provide him with its advice immediately
following the June 5 meeting.
I would be pleased to receive comment from individuals if you want to
post here or send messages direct to me at NPWS. All comments/
suggestions will be provided to NAKCC members.
Jeff Hardy
Coordinator Wildlife Licensing
NSW NPWS
[email protected]