Wattso, in my opinion, laws have to be there before an crime, otherwise when someone does something illegal, it wouldn't really be illegal until someone made a law about it. (If that makes any sense whatsoever!)
What I meant (and agreed I left it way open to interpretation) was that, in an ideal world, people wouldn't do anything against the law, there wouldn't be any need for police, judges, lawyers (there goes my job!) and we could live in peace *starts singing kum bay yah*
Very idealistic I know :lol:
Unfortuantly this isn't an ideal world, far from it. I dont think that being able to have guns in the home is necessarily the answer either. I am a criminal lawyer and the ratio of people who I have asked "If you could have used a gun instead of that knife/syringe/screwdriver in that home invasion/burglary/mugging would you?" the answer is almost always yes. I think what you are forgetting (and by all means correct me if I am wrong) is that not only would you have a gun in which to protect yourself, but so would the so and so who broke into your home. Chances are, (generalising here) he who broke into your home would be more adept at using his gun and also, you may have a straight .38 smith and weson (sorry, reading patricia cornwell) and he might have the same gun, sawnoff with hollow points which explode on impact. The chances of you surviving a shot from the bad guy's gun is very slim. If it doesn't hit one of your vitals, you could very easily bleed out.
As far as bleeding heart judges go, I 100% agree with you. Also, there are corrupt cops, lawyers who'll twist the law into unimaginable meanings in order to get their client of, and judges who will believe them. We really need an overhaul of our judicial system. Make everyone sit their law exams again!
Well, thats enough from me,
Amy