Here is a pair of mine i brought as atherton hatchies but they dont look like athertons to me much anymore.
Here is a pair of mine i brought as atherton hatchies but they dont look like athertons to me much anymore.
Those coastals are just beautiful Paula, wouldn't mind a coupla those
some of the 50/50 diamond x jungles I just sold.
View attachment 169475View attachment 169476View attachment 169477
I thought the locale was a bit confusing...Here is a pair of mine i brought as atherton hatchies but they dont look like athertons to me much anymore.
Here is a pair of mine i brought as atherton hatchies but they dont look like athertons to me much anymore.
i think the best looking snakes i have seen here is the master blaster and barramundis white md, but though you are desperately trying to justify this new turn in the "hobby", the calls of 95% honesty etc are just bulldust in my opinion.
Out of all the snakes pictured, only a few have actually stated what they are. Sure they are called rpm/jags etc but what is it? Never a call on the actual cross. The quote above shows just how easily it is to not know.
I may be wrong but personally it feels from reading this entire thread that there is a lot of backslapping and grandstanding taking place ,but that few of you actually truly know the exact heritage of your animals.
The american nick who posted earlier has nailed it.
There will be some nice looking "insert sales pitch here (face melters)" animals produced but it will be at a cost.
What will be, will be. No good, no bad just what is.
How about you label your animals what they are ie jungle x diamond x md or whatever, instead of just rpm or jag? At least that way you will be keeping in line with your call of honest heritage, makes it easier for the average joe like me who couldn't give a toss about keeping up with all the genetic jargon.
Enter your email address to join: