I posted the most sympathetic article towards him but there are plenty more out there that if the stated facts are true, then there would be no doubt about his being a paedophile. Its not the size of his weaner that is the problem but the size of his conscience. The damage these individuals do for the sake of their own self gratification often lasts a lifetime and can ruin what should have been a happy and fulfilling life. And that applies to each and every victim. There is the normal childhood sexual curiosity of "I'll show you mine if you show me yours" and whatever interactions may result from that. These maggots of humanity prey on this emerging sexuality of children. Some don't even wait for that. They want to use this childhood sexuality and the fact that sometimes it results "illegal sex", which really should not be seen as a criminal act, as a reason to reduce the age of consent. Clearly, whatever the legal age of consent, the difference in age must play a major part up until an individual is adult.
Individuals may reflect back on childhood encounters of a sexual nature. Those memories may be pleasant and desirable. So long as they in the realm of reflected upon memories I do not consider that to be abnormal or perverse. However, to wish to share similar memories with someone else, to take sexual pleasure out of images of vulnerable young children or to entertain thoughts of doing what you did as a kid but as an adult, even if no actions result from this, are all forms of paedophilia in my book and therefore just as reprehensible. There is a very clear clear difference between normal and perverse but paedophiles are very good at trying to blur that line.
I have always found it interesting that our government's child protection agencies have pushed the "Stranger Danger" aspect of paedophiles. The reality is that most sexual abuse of children is the doings of someone they know - relatives, family friends etc. What kids need to know is what is inappropriate. With my own children I used the guidelines provided by a very clued-up lady I watched on TV many years ago. She said kids simply need to know what is private and should not be viewed or touched by others. She did state that you need to explain about doctors and parents and "limited access" - cannot remember the exact details now. Anyway, her point was that anything covered by your bathers (bikini bathers for females) is private. Anyone suggesting they should look at or touch these areas is doing the wrong thing. Similarly, anyone wanting to show you or wanting you to touch their private areas is also doing the wrong thing. You need to leave immediately and let a parent know as soon as possible. I reckon that's the best advice on the subject that I have heard.
Sorry about the rant. Was not intended. I'll post it anyway as it might be of some help.
Blue