I usually like these arguments... And the stoners all come out with evidence of cancer curing, pain relieving, god given plant growing wonders.... While the alternative support the whole THC causes depression, the smoke causes lung damage and blah blah blah....
Then, the threads get canned very quickly.
Personally, the only cancer curing properties do not come from the THC producing plants at all, in fact, it comes from a plant that, even if you smoked, ate and (what ever else you do) ingested a few plants you'd be about as high as a person who doesn't take drugs....
So, those who wish to provide their stoner convictions by justifying some wonder drug, think again...
MDMA is a different kettle of fish... I almost see harm minimisation being the main issue there... But you know, if people can't be happy with what they've got, then there's serious other issues with them...
Personally, I quit drinking (and don't take drugs) just based on all the stupidity out there. I have never failed to have a good time at a party.
A few parties back I had one beer (ouch) in a dark bottle, and continued to fill that same bottle (once empty) with water... No one questioned if I was sober or not (they were all getting very drunk). Everyone had a good time, and I was still a sober driver (despite drinking like a dozen bottles haha).
So... Drugs? Do they really need to be legalised? Or can people just learn to actually enjoy themselves with what they've got...?