what's a VDK test?
Not carpets but bhp's do show up as tigers
If the doctors follow the correct protocol then they should NOT administer anti-venom until the patient becomes symptomatic which would not happen from a Carpet or BHP bite so any false reading to a non-ven should be irrelevant.
Good way to go about things but as we all know in the heat of the moment some of these protocols get forgotten. Friend copped a rouphie bite and with only minor symptoms was given some rediculous amount of antivenom (I don't remember the exact number but it was well in excess of 3 vials, something ludicrous). But at least he is still here to tell the tale. I'll have to ask him exactly how much antvenom he copped. I know afterwards he was worried for his liver.
If the doctors follow the correct protocol then they should NOT administer anti-venom until the patient becomes symptomatic which would not happen from a Carpet or BHP bite so any false reading to a non-ven should be irrelevant. They may of course prepare IV lines, draw blood for various tests including fibrinogen levels and tests for DIC, full blood count, electrolysis and calcium, creatinine kinase and arterial blood gases etc, and collect urine IN CASE symptoms ensue.
That sounds like a very handy thing to carry with you, wouldn't be able to pass that info or a link to somewhere that has it would you?Which is exactly why I carry a laminated card with the current correct medical treatment for snake bite in medical language with me whenever I get a callout to relocate a snake.
That sounds like a very handy thing to carry with you, wouldn't be able to pass that info or a link to somewhere that has it would you?
If the doctors follow the correct protocol then they should NOT administer anti-venom until the patient becomes symptomatic which would not happen from a Carpet or BHP bite so any false reading to a non-ven should be irrelevant. They may of course prepare IV lines, draw blood for various tests including fibrinogen levels and tests for DIC, full blood count, electrolysis and calcium, creatinine kinase and arterial blood gases etc, and collect urine IN CASE symptoms ensue.
Good way to go about things but as we all know in the heat of the moment some of these protocols get forgotten. Friend copped a rouphie bite and with only minor symptoms was given some rediculous amount of antivenom (I don't remember the exact number but it was well in excess of 3 vials, something ludicrous). But at least he is still here to tell the tale. I'll have to ask him exactly how much antvenom he copped. I know afterwards he was worried for his liver.
One would want to know what the minor symptoms were before passing judgement. I assume you are referring to Tropidechis carinatus. There a several reasons for giving antivenom even when the patient doesn't appear to be rolling over and dieing. Organ, nerve and tissue breakdown with internal bleeding being major problems. So 3 vials should not be considered ludicrous.
did you use urine or serum as the test sample, i have found in dogs that serum samples quite often give false positives to any of them.
Enter your email address to join: