B
Bluetongue1
Guest
....Leaves etc long term, just adds a much higher risk to harm your animals in a number of different ways that paper does not. ...
Far from newspaper being for the benefit of the keeper it is used so much because it works well which benefits the animal. It is way more hygienic than any type of loose substrate as it forces the keeper to do a complete clean as soon as it is fouled as opposed to spot cleans which other substrates encourage.
The big difference is that in the wild reptiles are not forced to lay in their waste like they are from being stuck in a box.
Thoroughness in the cleaning up of wastes is dependant upon the keeper, not the substrate. Different substrates require different amounts of time and diligence but all suitable substrates are amenable to thorough removal of wastes. Paper is certainly amongst the quickest and easiest to clean and therefore a good choice for busy people and those with large collections. For those that enjoy looking at their snakes in a more natural setting, wood, coir and leaf substrates are much more pleasing on the eye and may therefore be considered worth the extra effort in cleaning.
The hygiene dangers are very much overstated in my opinion. There are a number of examples of neglected collections where snakes had no substrate and were living in their own wet wastes. The health of the animals was affected by lack of food and water rather than bacterial infection. There are also a number of cases of Mulga Snakes and BHPs swallowing their own faeces, to no ill effect. I feel we automatically assume that bacteria from the gut will damage reptiles when outside the gut, which is actually seldom the case. Faecal matter retained in the colon and kept at least moderately moist is a different kettle of fish. Under these conditions certain intestinal bacteria are able to multiple to way above normal numbers and the level of their toxic wastes produced can be injurious to the reptile.
Blue