I agree 100%.
However, if downloads were not available at all and he chose not to buy the music anyway, then they have lost his money.
For example, I have never bought and will never buy a 2Pac cd, but if there was one song I liked and I downloaded it, I would not be costing the artist or music industry and money because I would never have bought the music anyway.
So basically they cannot lose what they never had.
There are also things to be said against this, like if I really liked the song and couldn't download it, then maybe I would have bought the cd for the song.
Anyway, I was just illustrating my point. It appears to me that BROWNS has specifically stopped buying because he can download, this means he is in no uncertain terms costing the artist and industry $$$.
Just so everyone is clear, I am not having a go at BROWNS, rather I am just expressing my opinion about his post, what he does is his business.
I still think this thread should be deleted and special rules added to prevent similar threads in the future.