I am replying to this post on principle.
All exotics should be only kept under the strictest conditions. This should be much more strict than the NSW venomous conditions, monthly reporting minimum.
I read an article in the early 1980's about a guy who caught snakes around the zoo, thse were not native to Sydney and he was alowed to keep the natives. I sincerely hope the zoo has improved their keeping skills. Birds were commonly escaping because of the salt in the air corroding the wire.
This country is known as the land of parrots 100+ species, monitors 25+ species (out of 30) and many species of marsupial (or monotreme) which all are threatened by people's pets or introductions, which I should not have to mention again.
I say if you want to keep exotics, then go and live in another country where you can, the USA is a good English speaking place.
I would not object to long gaol terms for people endangering our wildlife and this includes keeping exotics, this would be a good deterent to protect our animals. I also would be happy to pay (through taxes) huge rewards $200,000+ for reporting of infringements that are prosecuted.
Note, I also include dog and cat owners in a problem that endangers our wildlife and woul like to see long gaol terms for any endangerment to our wildlife.
You people who want exotics just because it looks good must not have seen a rainbow lorikeet or a frill-necked lizard. If you move to where you can keep them, then what you have left (natives) will cost you a lot more because they are better looking and more diverse animals.
I hope they never legalise exotics beacuse of the: cane toad, starling, noisy miner etc, etc. Wake up and see why USA has so many of our species there at great risk to their smugglers.