thanks guys, yer the bells is very clean. When i bought him i was the first in, hence I got pick of the clutch.
the normal is a lovely animal also, picked him/her up last night. i really wanted a normal so i had one of each.
Great to see you got them in that enclosure Jase, I bet they love it. Is "lacie" a female for Bella?
It all depends on whether the pair are heterozygous or homozygous. If one or both are homozygous, all of the babies will be Bell's phase. If they're both heterozygous, 25% of the babies will be normal phase, the rest Bell's phase.Anyone have any info on the results from a bells x bells pairings?
Not co-dominant. It appears to be classically Mendelian dominant.So essentially it's codom with out a super form?
I'd say Matt was just being conservative, based on little available information (the three clutches of Bells x Bells he mentioned were his own, the Bells x normal someone else's), and there's nothing wrong with that. However, I wouldn't jump to the conclusion that anything other than normal Mendelian dominance was happening on the basis of getting a similar ratio from a single mating between a Bell's phase and a normal. Way too small a sample size for any sort of significance, especially as the average clutch size for lace monitors is small (around 7-10 eggs) and the difference between the predicted result of 50% and surprise result of 75% (I presume he meant 75% / 25% ratio rather than 76% / 24%, because the latter would require a clutch of 25 babies, which lace monitors don't produce) is one or two babies.In Mike Swan's book they talk about tests they did that still hadn't produced conclusive results.