kittycat17
Well-Known Member
I told myself I wouldn't post on this, as I may well devolve into an incomprehensible ranting mess, but I feel it had to be voiced. While I see the merit in documented lineages (I too like to know the ancestry of the reptiles I keep), I have misgivings. The world of pedigrees hardly ever benefits the animal. You only have to look at dogs and cats for example. Some people become near fanatical, obsessed with keeping bloodlines pure, even at the cost of the animal's health, breeding for more extreme features with each generation. They line-breed their chosen animals literally to death. Some breeds can't even reproduce without the aid of a vet. Many people appear to only care about winning shows, making money, or just like to play God simply because they can. It's already happening in reptiles as it is. In reptiles there's no breeds. There's no cross-breeds, mixed-breeds, or mongrels. They're species, sub-species, or hybrids, if you will. I can see the good intentions of documented lineages for our captive reptiles, but knowing human nature, someone's going to take it too far. Our native reptiles are not domesticated animals, they're not man made. They don't need "improving". Why don't we keep it that way?
Wasn't an incomprehensible ranting mess at all and I did think of this myself
True line breeding in cats and dogs has proved to be disastrous for many breeds (not only causing heart defects, breathing issues etc) but if an animal can't give birth on its own eg a bulldog or staffy why would you keep pushing them down that line! So on that I totally agree with you
I think with the recent obsession of mixing species where morphs are involved that lineages would be good for those still involved in pure and locality animals eg Palmerston jungles, Tanami Womas etc to prove the background of the animal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk