Broome stimos are found a little further than 30km from Broome, Proserpine's are found further than 30km from town. Gosford gold and the list goes on. Locale specific works well doesn't it.
Well then maybe they should not be called "Broome stimos" etc.
Let's look at that line of Windorah locality stimsoni that are going around at the moment. Some people call them South-west Queensland stimsoni. Other people call them Windorahs. Both are (to my knowledge) accurate, just one is more specific than the other. That's fine.
What's
not fine in my opinion is tacking on some arbitrary locality name. Sure, that particularly line may well be locality specific. But what would happen if someone had a
true Mossman (okay bad example, but let's ignore that fact) locality stimsoni that they then paired up with one of these
close-enough-to-Mossman locality animals? Suddenly your offspring are not locality specific.
Now we can say that animal X is of Brisbane locality, or we can say they're Queensland locality, neither is wrong, they're both technically correct. But we can't call a Gladstone locality animal a Brisbane locality animal and not expect to make people unhappy.
End of the day, they didn't have to claim the
apparently incorrect Mossman locality when they could simply have called them "North East Queensland" locality. Not as specific, but at least it's not a lie.