-Peter, I'm sorry if your brain can't make the parallel... have you heard of 'putting Dracula in charge of the Bloodbank'? Maybe that's an example you can grasp. It's the very same sort of reasoning behind the fact that state conservation 'authorities' deliberately don't select wildlife officers with an interest in keeping animals - they get too close to those they are supposed to be supervising and it compromises their enforcement role. We may think they would be ideal employees, but they won't perform as they are supposed to.
Passions (of all sorts) lead to compromises, and even basically good people can be subject to temptation under some circumstances. I'm not justifying it for a minute, and I'm glad you know heaps of lovely people -Peter (as I do too)... but I'm not in a business which depends on exclusive, rare high-end morphs to retain a commercial edge. Even one or two animals slipping between the cracks, whether stolen for money or passion, could compromise a breeding program which has taken years to put in place...
Adderboy is, in the long run, quite correct... it's Allen's business who he employs and why he employs who he does. His rationale is based on experience, and I can't argue with that (even if I did use a 'stupid' example... sorry for that...)
Jamie.