Ihaveherps, after a lifetime in the herp circles, I don't know too many participants that would qualify for the saint status, including some big names who are now in the forefront of herpetoculture, even in herpetology, not excluding myself. If we keep looking back and polarizing people by what we "have heard" about them (which is usually the case), we will never make a step forward. Like you, I am also from the old school but I have learned that it's better to look for the good that the evil - both are everywhere you look.
Michael, Im totally on board with your post, believing that every person has the right to make their own judgments, be right or wrong, though this isnt what Im debating. For the sake of the point at hand, lets divorce the person, from the act of aligning your name with your product/company.
The target audience, the punter, the herper, however small a percentage, expressed concern about paying to a face-less company, thats a fact... and as far as business sense (seeing as the point of the symposium being a registered business is flung around), the reply was poor. Rather than take on board the criticism, and at best opening the information to the public (obviously the absolute best outcome seeing as the nature of the concerns, and being raised in public forum), the company stance was to argue the right to stay un-named, and even remove the organisers name once it was bought to the publics attention. As an objective bystander, it was dismissive at the very least (price never ruled me out, work schedule did).
I am not attacking the symposium itself as i am sure it is an asset to the herp community, though as a business , the way the general public was handled, and concerns addressed, leaves alot to be required. To be honest, the post of yours above is testament to the shady foundations that, if we are to be honest, this entire herp hobby is founded on... but we dont always have to play in the shaddows.
Hopefully you can read this not as venomous, but as a third party observation, and take it on board, rather than dismiss as an attack.