moosenoose
Legendary
The points here are simple.
1. Safety.
2. Risks to our native wildlife.
3. Imprisonment (up to 2 years) and/or
4. Huge fines ($10k+)
?.and for what? Because it looks different, or it?s a novelty? The big question of ?IF? you ever get tired of it, then what? People are swapping carpets left right & centre all the time. I?m all for the keeping of non venomous exotics though (and if it can be done properly, even the venomous ones!). The international license works as far as I?m concerned, and I can?t understand why its implementation can?t be further introduced across the community. I do understand however, the blanket ban on exotic animals is not only simple, but cost effective for the DSE.
If these venomous exotics are permitted to be privately kept, the main problem will be the cost factor involved with their regular maintenance. Who foots the cost in the keeping of AV at the local hospitals for these keepers (definitely not the responsibility of taxpayers)? The cost would most certainly have to fall on the keepers themselves. I?d be interested in hearing what the processes are involved with the stocking of AV to local hospitals (I dare say I?ll get a good answer on this). Am I also correct in saying that if a keeper has a native Elapid in their possession, that their closest hospital has to be notified on the type of animal kept, as to ensure there is a supply of the appropriate AV on call?
I realize that here in Melbourne that stocks of AV for Copperheads, Tiger snakes and Red Bellies etc are commonplace. But, the stocking of AV for Inland Taipans & Death Adders etc at our local hospitals would seem to be an irrelevant acquisition simply because they are not a threat to the people here.. It would be like New Zealand stocking a large and varied supply of anti snake venom, it?s just not necessary.
The best thing we can hope for at the moment is that the DSE isn?t ever going to become complacent about this topic. Their decisions at times to me can seem rather ruthless, and sometimes not very well thought out. But through the articles and news clippings I read from time to time, I?m certainly glad we?re not the U.S. and experiencing the problems they are due to lax regulations. :roll:
1. Safety.
2. Risks to our native wildlife.
3. Imprisonment (up to 2 years) and/or
4. Huge fines ($10k+)
?.and for what? Because it looks different, or it?s a novelty? The big question of ?IF? you ever get tired of it, then what? People are swapping carpets left right & centre all the time. I?m all for the keeping of non venomous exotics though (and if it can be done properly, even the venomous ones!). The international license works as far as I?m concerned, and I can?t understand why its implementation can?t be further introduced across the community. I do understand however, the blanket ban on exotic animals is not only simple, but cost effective for the DSE.
If these venomous exotics are permitted to be privately kept, the main problem will be the cost factor involved with their regular maintenance. Who foots the cost in the keeping of AV at the local hospitals for these keepers (definitely not the responsibility of taxpayers)? The cost would most certainly have to fall on the keepers themselves. I?d be interested in hearing what the processes are involved with the stocking of AV to local hospitals (I dare say I?ll get a good answer on this). Am I also correct in saying that if a keeper has a native Elapid in their possession, that their closest hospital has to be notified on the type of animal kept, as to ensure there is a supply of the appropriate AV on call?
I realize that here in Melbourne that stocks of AV for Copperheads, Tiger snakes and Red Bellies etc are commonplace. But, the stocking of AV for Inland Taipans & Death Adders etc at our local hospitals would seem to be an irrelevant acquisition simply because they are not a threat to the people here.. It would be like New Zealand stocking a large and varied supply of anti snake venom, it?s just not necessary.
The best thing we can hope for at the moment is that the DSE isn?t ever going to become complacent about this topic. Their decisions at times to me can seem rather ruthless, and sometimes not very well thought out. But through the articles and news clippings I read from time to time, I?m certainly glad we?re not the U.S. and experiencing the problems they are due to lax regulations. :roll: