moosenoose
Legendary
Apparently it's not a tent unless it's pegged to the ground (according to the definition of a tent)...so perhaps this young lady has a legal leg to stand on
Whether they antagonised the police or not, whether their protest is valid or useless, whether they are professional protestors or not etc is all totally irrelevant. The police cannot go ripping peoples clothing off in public for no other reason than they deem it inappropriate. The police in Melbourne have a habit of doing this sort of thing. Where I live I routinely see police telling young people, on freezing cold days, to take their hoodies off in public, why, because they can so they do. But legally they can't but a 16 year old boy being harassed by police is not going to have a clue about standing up for his legal right to wear what he wants so he complies and the police win. This is exactly the same. The Mayor, who is a pompous donkey, decided to enact a council by law and not allow the erecting of tents in Melbourne. Wearing a tent in a statement about this is not erecting a tent and therefore not illegal. The police had absolutely no right to rip this girls clothing off whether it was a tent or a plastic bag. The fact it was filmed and uploaded to youtube is totally irrelevant. She wasn't being strip searched because they suspected she had any kind of contraband, she was being humiliated by police because they could, completely different. Please point out to me the written law that states you cannot wear a tent in public in Melbourne.
EDIT: This is the same mayor who sees anyone who doesn't live within the city limits as a bogan and tried to pass a law stating that "bogans" where not allowed into Melbourne.
No I don't as the issue raised is about the fact she was stripped because she was wearing a tent. I'm not going to bother getting into the violation of our democratic right to protest as that is something people could argue about all day, I am going to stick within the very narrow frame of what the police are legally allowed to do when dealing with a member of the public. Not sure if that is what you meant, if not please enlighten me.Do you see the problem here? You're having trouble seeing past idiot lord mayors and people wearing tents.
I can't keep track of who the bad guy is,police,protester,politician,press?
Don't both you and gordo get the $7,500 help out scheme? I know in NZ we get no help what so ever, and house prices are comparable.
Never thought I'd see that sentence written when I joined APS.
Yeah I vote you change your ridiculous signature !!!!!!!
Treasurer Wayne Swan has warned the nation's major banks they face the wrath of their customers if they don't pass on the latest official interest rate cut in full.
Mr Swan said he expected the cut to be passed through in full.
"I think families and small businesses will be really angry with the banks if they try to hold back on the rate cut, particularly given how massively profitable banks are," he told ABC Radio on Wednesday.
:lol: Why bother voting? Just wear a tent and protest
If you wear a tent will you have to call it clothing? But then the fashion police will have a law against it?:lol: Why bother voting? Just wear a tent and protest
Nice. just to make it clear; more folks check out Youtube than wander through Melbourne. Fighting for the cause INVOLVES posting videos on Youtube, welcome to 2011 have a nice day !!!!
Classic fence-sitter with no idea. You say you agree with their beliefs, even though you think they have no idea what their beliefs are. You acknowledge the blanket media attention but say it's pointless. You mention the hundreds and thousands the 6 O clock news exposes the cause to; yet you think Youtube is pointless, with almost a BILLION members.. Not even going to bother with this one... You're "I would think..." hypothetical fence-sitting overtones say it already
not really a fair comparisonGallileo to Einstein to Sea Shepherd
They certainly aren't getting their message across clearly Eitak, and there in lies the problem. The whole tent fiasco thing was merely an exercise in "how far can we push the police". It's like those morons from the G20 protests etc. Half of them wouldn't know why they are there, except simply for the mob mentality. The other problem is they "think" they are so smart and it's their god given right to "occupy" areas that could be potential security risks. Has anyone bothered asking the question "how much has the additional security and waste of police resources this has cost the taxpayer?
Enter your email address to join: