I would have interpreted it as "I'm in this for the money, and don't place an inherent value on snakes, just an instrumental value".
I'd pay big money for any snake I particularly desire from a personal standpoint. Please note that the following is simply a personal viewpoint and not intended to berate others.
If an albino python of any species was worth $5, I would not own one. I would not house one in captivity myself, unless it was unable to be re-homed, as I wholly consider albinism an unattractive mutant. I understand why certain people desire albinos, but simply, I am partial to neither their genetic nor phenotypic expression.
If rough-scaled pythons were still worth $5,000 I woud be interested in obtaining some when funds could provision it. I have a great interest in the species and I dearly look forward to keeping some myself again. I am fairly happy that I will not be paying $5,000 per snake! But I would if that was the price to pay for keeping a species of such fascinating ecology, morphology, biogeography and behaviour. This is just one of a plethora of species for which I would pay high prices.
The inherent value I place on a reptile species is not influenced by the instrumental (money) value others impose on that species. I don't treat reptiles as commodities. For example, there are members on this forum who have received quantities of instrumentally valuable snakes from me in the past, free of charge, just because they share the same inherent value ethic with me.