Aussie Pythons & Snakes Forum

Help Support Aussie Pythons & Snakes Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Stop being selfish, be happy with what you've got.

If it means so much to you than bloody well move overseas. Keep Australia's wildlife unique.
 
How are the Cane Toads down south, they're on their way and boy will they do some damage to some natives when they get there. But I guess if they were more attrative than what they were replacing less people would care. I understand the first to go are the RBBs.

My front garden has several green tree frogs one brown tree snake and dozens of cane toads. Wont be long and there will just be dozens of cane toads.

However this arguement is classic catch 22. If exotics were legal and i am cool that they are not then at least people would be able to sell rather than release their unwanted pets.

If they find snakes on Mars will we all want one of them too....I suspect it is just human nature.

I just want a GTP!
 
Matty

Wright back at you. Stop being so selfish, be happy with what you've got. Keep Australias wildlife unique in their own areas.

If you want a Water Python, move to the tropics.
 
bigguy said:
Matty

Wright back at you. Stop being so selfish, be happy with what you've got. Keep Australias wildlife unique in their own areas.

If you want a Water Python, move to the tropics.

If that was directed as a come-back, you've altered the concept completely by saying "Keep Australias Wilfelife unique...in their own areas", as i originally said keep Australia's wildlife unique, not keep everyone of Australias states wildlife seperate from the other states. Besides, i don't even keep a Water Python, and i'm far from selfish - i've got one herp and have had for 5 and a half years.

If everyone starts keeping the same herps as one another worldwide, than there may aswell be no herp society as it will be bloody well boring...wasn't everyone just saying how much they enjoyed the talk on African Reptiles at the recent VHS meeting? I quote from Jurassic Park 3: "There's a difference between an astronaut and an astronomer", you don't always have to have everything to be able to appreciate it.

I quite enjoy looking at foreigners herps, for example Kevyns Retic, would you rather say "Awesome!" or "Yeah, they look the same as all of my 5 mate's retics"?

Get a grip, would it really be for the better? If you've got high hopes in the herp world, concerntrate on getting a GTP or Perentie, if that isn't enough than concerntrate on different phases...if you're hard to please than go and see them in their own country, or better yet see them in the wilf in their own habitat. There will always be ample options no matter how far you want to go, we don't need to create more problems - we've got enough to be happy with. It's easy enough to say "Oh but we've already got our own native animals causing troubles that exotics could do", but that's exactly the point, we've already got more than enough troubles with our own native animals - why do we need more problems just because a few people are too selfish for their own good, and the rest of Australias good for that matter.
 
its a whole different argument matty.

the fact is legalising exotics just makes sense now, its not to satisfy ppl. ppl dont have to keep them if they dont want to.

if it were to happen the herp situation wouldnt change too much, i mean thered still be different phases and sought after herps. just more variety
 
basketcase said:
its a whole different argument matty..

No, no it isn't.

basketcase said:
ppl dont have to keep them if they dont want to.

But that is.

basketcase said:
thered still be different phases and sought after herps. just more variety

More unnecessary average herps. I personally believe if exotics came in, people would forget about our own beautiful reptiles and everyone would just start regarding exotics as "the good ones"...i certainly do not want this. People just don't see the big picture, all they feel is greed and they want what others don't have, than they'll realise what a mistake it was when the product is causing more issues than ever, and everyone has them. . .it's the same with almost anything that even has a slight hint of braging rights.

We do not need exotics!
 
Sorry guys - real life has intruded - had to bury my mum :)

Spitmore does have a point in asking "What makes keeping an exotic reptile(one from another country) so different than keeping a native species in an area to which it doesn't naturally occour?".

In short my answer is, for some species, is none, for others it's the degree of risk. If the animal has invasive potential for a particular area then we should not be keeping it in that area regardless of its point of origin! But people will keep pets, complete prohibition won't work, so the powers that be limit our choices to a number of animals, most of which I agree with, but some I don't.

Along with degradation and fragmentation of habitat, translocation of animals is one of the major problems many species have today, when people move into a area they bring many fellow travelers with them, both intentionally and unintentionally. We them put the resident species at a huge disadvantage by poking gaping holes into the existing biosphere so that they are already under stress then we introduce other animals and plants to compete with the survivors. However, just because a animal is brought into a area does not mean that it will eventually establish a viable population.

Now I, along with the powers to be, don't believe that water pythons could establish themselves in SA. For one, there is no obvious barrier to them reaching SA, after all they have had thousands of years to do it, so why not? This is the degree of risk I was talking about before. there are no physicial barriers to prevent WPs from reaching SA so it must be something else.
Now lets look at the corn snake, it lives in a climate that is similar to Adelaide and can definitely breed here. The only thing that has stopped it from reaching Australia before is a little thing called the Pacific Ocean. In fact if it did establish here and spread then you could properly divide Australia into two parts, the north with the cane toad and the south with the corn snake. Also it strikes me as funny how there is grumbling about the government doing nothing about cane toads but to do something about exotic reptiles is just too hard. Also making cats legal hasn't stopped them from doing damage to the enviroment.

However there is at least one Australian reptile (possible two) that may have established a feral population in SA, The eastern water dragon. Now it is possible for the authorities to do a number of things about EWD, one of which is that they attempt to wipe out the free-range population and ban the keeping of the animal (hopefully they would allow the export of captive animals back to the east coast before the hypothetical ban took place, in which case you guys can expect heaps of cheap EWD coming your way). Now if after the hypothetical ban took place and I discovered someone keeping them illegally, would I perform civic duty required of me and report them - YES - even though I think that the EWD is a magnificent animal, I love them, and the report would send it to the freezer. Conservation laws are not perfect, far from it but they are all we have to work with. If you don't like the laws as is then campaign, talk to you MP (PSST want my vote? I'?ll swap it for a corny), start a petition but moaning and whining on a fringe web site will only get the usual suspects to agree and the other usual suspects to disagree. As what this post will do.

Now a number of people also seem to think that illeagals is just a lark and a minor crime and perhaps it is but it is a crime on the end of a string of crimes. Every exotic that is purchased means that someone has either bred it illegally or imported it illegally. So that makes two crimes, three if the animal was taken from the wild illegally. So every purchase of an exotic only encourages and finances the importation of more exotics. Now Slatey, when you purchased the snake from the guy who turned up to your work, didn't you think that there was something wrong? I admire you greatly and believe that the hobby benefits from you and you kin?s unpaid generosity but that sounds like buying something that fell of the back of a truck.



And IMO, (nothing humble about it tonight :) ) WA should definitely not allow the importation of eastern reptiles, EWD in particular. Westies have a great range of reptiles to choose from, savior them guys.


And incidentally, I'm being transferred to QLD soon, hopefully Townsville, if that happens I'll sell by beloved waters rather than risk polluting the local QLD form with the NT form.







Now for your examples Greg,

Goulds monitor

Simon I see you have just aquired a goulds monitor.Goulds monitors certainly aren't native to Newcastle so what makes it ok to keep one there?
Go and get your copy of Coggers 'Reptiles and Amphibians of Australia' and look at the distribution of Varanus gouldlii. Quote 'Found throughout most parts of continental Australia except the extreme south-east and those forests of the east coast subject to very high rainfall. Extra-limitial in the seasonally dry Savannahs of southern New Guinea' end quote. So if V.gouldii is not found in Newcastle then it is either found very close by or has become recently locally extinct.

Glossy Black-Cockatoo

Why do you quote from newspapers without doing further research? It only diminishes your argument when you use a poorly written reference.
This URL http://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au...ation+rejection+of+endangered+species+listing states that the Glossy Black-Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus lathami lathami (Temminck, 1807) has had its endangered species listing rejected. You must be talking about the
KI sub species Calyptorhynchus lathami halmaturinus which does face many threats but the long-billed corella (Cacatua tenuirostris) is not one of them (This bird has had is own problems, mainly the devastation of its food supplies but has bounced back recently with a vengeance). You must be referring to the little corella (Cacatua pastonator) , which, in fairness, does have a long-billed form but not in SA. This bird has introduced itself (NOT released) to KI along with the Galah (Cacatua roseicapilla). Some species of cockatoos, the galah, the sulfur-crested ( Cactua galerita ) , the cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandicus) and the little corella have greatly benefited from current agricultural practices and have expanded their range. If you sit at Cape Jarvis on the SA mainland you can easily see KI, it?s less than 20 kilometers away , an easy flight

Go to these sites
http://www.tasweb.com.au/bapa/glossy.htm#Current threats
http://homepages.picknowl.com.au/kic/glossy/chew4.html
for more on the current threats to the KI glossy.




Further reading

Summary of fauna survey in lofty ranges Adelaide ? claims two introduced reptile species found ? Doesn't give names
http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:...pdf+introduced+reptiles+south+Australia&hl=en

Feral birds in WA
http://biology.usgs.gov/s+t/noframe/x187.htm
http://www.ecwa.asn.au/info/feralbirds.html

Using virus's to kill snakes ? READ THIS TO SEE HOW THEY INTEND TO CONTROL FERAL SNAKES
http://natzoo.si.edu/Publications/ZooGoer/2000/1/curingguamsnake.cfm

Re-introducing Water dragons to Sydney ( good photo )
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/10/30/1067233325030.html?oneclick=true

IMHO silly story on the amnesty - does claim that the animals were ill-kept - take with salt
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,9659901%5E28101,00.html
 
just a few points.firstly we have feral natives and exotics in this country already,of which we have no real control, over some, no control whatsoever.SO WHAT WE SHOULD DO IS BRING AND KEEP COUNTLESS HUNDREDS OF OTHER SPECIES HERE BECAUSE EVERYONE IS GOING TO HAVE STRICT QUARANTINE AND THERE IS NO FUTURE CHANCE OF ANY PROBLEMS WITH EXOTICS FROM THIS POINT ON.WE AS AUSTRALIANS AFTER 200 PLUS YEARS HAVE ALL TOGETHER FINALLY LEARNT OUR LESSON.
good point splitmore,but a rediculous arguement if you look at the state of things today because of ignorance in the past.anyone who condones the legal keeping of exotics in this country is an ignorant part of our next biggest f!@#$p,congradulations.we have enough to deal with now,things on a natural level aren't getting better ppl.be happy with what we have or move to the states,because they have such a fabulous record with there exotics,it really works over there,NOT.zoos can import exotics because they are an easily regulated less numerous body.when a zoo stuffs up,they can be in deep sh$t.i agree again with you bob[this is becoming a habit]zoo quarantine can be slack,but will every single person who keeps an exotic be always better with there hygiene and be regulated easier than the zoo system.no chance.i know a zoo up here has been fighting for years to aquire venomous exotics, in particular king cobras.they have constantly hit a brick wall, an absolute no.a king surviving in nth qld rainforest is almost quaranteed.i am, as a second to none proud defender of our unique wildlife totally disheartened that my fellow countrymen could because they just want to keep an exotic,would place even a hint of a risk of any future pressure on our already damaged environment.with the very possibility of a major catasrophy[cane toad]i am not even prepared to risk it.132 cane toads released aren't much are they?,so whoever has the answer to the cane toad problem and who can 100% quarantee that there will be now risk with other exotics,pm me and change my mind.

a comment also made was that police are never going to stop drugs as npws wont prevent exotic keeping.thank god you don't run the country.otherwise we would just give up.you obviously have been lucky enuogh to have never been affected by a family member abusing drugs.i hope that is for you always the case.


obee
 
Fuscus said:
In short my answer is, for some species, is none, for others it's the degree of risk. If the animal has invasive potential for a particular area then we should not be keeping it in that area regardless of its point of origin!

And that is the only relevant part of the post in respects to both non endemic and exotics.
Peter
 
moosenoose said:
.....the Yorkshire Terrier owning politian who could if he really wants to, put the pen to the paper to give exotic reptiles the tick of approval ...

incorrect - Yorkshire Terrier owning politian will only give exotic reptiles the tick of approval if there are a net gain in votes for them.
"Vote for me. And I'll let the guy down the end of the street keep 340 kilo pythons" isn't going to sit well with joe public.
 
moosenoose said:
that Yorkshire terrier because at the end of the day they are cute WARM-BLOODED animals, and we keep EVIL COLD-BLOODED, UNAFFECTIONATE ONES :shock: !.....ahh, I feel better now..next topic! :D

Ahh yes Fuscus! and this is the way the general public who gives him the votes see it also! :?
 
hehe :)

i agree completely with obee, and it alls works nicely if they werent already here, but they are. i personally have no idea what should be done about it but something definately has to be... amnesties arent the answer thats for sure
 
well, splitdude.....I am also aposed to exotics in Australian collection (other than Zoo's etc), We are pritty well disease free and believe me you would want to keep it that way. Lets look at the Red eared Pond sliders we have in Qld, not a native but has taken a hold of some of out larger lakes in South East Qld, competting against and pushing out our native wildlife, other eg. Cane Toads, pigs, foxes, horses, cammals and Cats all been introduced for domestic perposes (except foxes that were introduced for hunting). split do you have exotics yourself? I dont believe that its worth the risk to bring these animals in to our country, why would you risk our native wildlife for your own pleasure. Besides Australia has alot more to offer plenty of herp here to keep ya happy
 
basketcase said:
... amnesties arent the answer thats for sure
amnesties are not the Complete answer, thats for sure but the huge public exposure and education sure helps. I had at least 20 non-herpers tell me about it so it has definatly spread the word far more people are aware that exotics are illeagal and that there are potentially hefty fines available for offenders. That is more important than the trivial amount of animals handed in.
 
The law will never change, just look at all the recent headlines over the past few years... "Exotics Illegal in QLD", "Exotic reptiles seized", "Exotics amnesty launched", they're all in favour of not bringing them into the country, so just forget about it and work with what we've been given naturally.
 
What about a whistle blower or amnestie television and radio advertising campaign. I would donate money to a worthwhile cause like that. And when you see/hear the ads, you know your money has gone to the right place..... (red cross.....grrrrr)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top