thomasssss
Very Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2011
- Messages
- 2,381
- Reaction score
- 0
thats basically the idea , they seem to be having a little trouble with the taps though any ideas
thats basically the idea , they seem to be having a little trouble with the taps though any ideas
So you don't see what was so funny in your post? wow!!Your sarcasm is positively divine. Pray tell, why did you find it so amusing? Or did you simply not understand it? Oh wait! Feuding again. Drat.
I suspect that like many who anthropomorphise their reptiles, the neediness demonstrated by sherlock is greater than that of her reptile... I just hate it when grown up (?) human beings turn their grand, beautiful "wild" creatures into simpering, cuddly (?!), cooperative "colleagues" - it's so degrading for these beautiful animals...
Jamie
Most wild elapids I am involved with and occasionally rehab appear to me to exibit a degree of trust following initial capture, but I've often wondered wether this is something they've "learn't" through gentle handling or perhaps we've just been condition to expect explosive defensive/aggressive reactions from any "dangerous" animal, which just isn't the case (Scrubbies aside)? Case in point, a wild caught (and released) Highland Copperhead that initially fled the scene on approach, was freehandled after some gentle persuasion (within 15 mins of capture) and remaind in the area long after release (see bottom left) . In that last pic, you can see it's chosen a patch of sun to remain in and flattened itself as in basking. I'm sure many of you have had similar experiences.
snakes can remain calm and settled in the right environment but they cant be disciplined or trained as in routine. If any one would like to debate me on this your more then welcome lol
Sherlock, did you read the article you posted? I can't find any reference comparing snakes intelligence to that of a mouse, all they say is previous methodology used was 'the maze' test which is used for rodents and that this test is flawed in it's inclusion to snake studies.
"The scientists then trained the snakes to learn and remember which hole led to shelter, by guiding them to the hole with their hands." This sentence screams human bias! Whilst I would have to get a valid password to access the full paper as mine has lapsed, I would still be cautious about using any results from this study if the above sentence has any truth.
One of the first things we had drilled into us in BSc was critically analyzing scientific publications. There is good science and bad science, just because something stands up to peer review doesn't always mean it doesn't contain certain flaws, sometimes BIG flaws.
I'm not trying to cut down any argument that snakes can be "trained" I believe it is possible, but I am yet to be convinced from a scientific stand point. I am willing to concede certain snake species have better cognitive abilities than others.
Are the cobra defanged?
Can you give me a link to the Luna Kiss Longqi? That is definatly something I would love to see.
Has your brain stopped yet? Sure sounds like it.Ahhh,no...my sides were still hurting from snakelady96's scrubby handling tips... Then I found this! Heeeedehaahaa..oohhh...argh....defrosting the rats! In a microwave! Aaahhhargh.my brain...stop....
The only comparison made was that early research methodology used the same test for both rodents and snakes, it was not a comparison about how similar snakes are to rodents at completing said task. Again I haven't bothered to obtain a copy of the original paper, but I doubt they would have omitted a finding as significant from the article.
One of the issues I had with the article is I truly believe the study did not conclusively show any significant findings as there was a mentioned interaction between the observer and the study animals, creating a bias that discredits the paper.
As for your observations, they are exactly that personal observations without any control over variables. Personal observations are useful and they often instigate further study to gain a true understanding of cause and effect, but they alone don't hold up to criticism. You believe what you experienced so that is useful to you, perhaps you can use that in the future.
If you look at facebook at [email protected] you will see many photos of Luna doing her stuff
I just got a video camera so might try to video it sometime
Its quite interesting to see
I'm with carterd on this one - my BHP is toilet "trained" and I use the word "trained" very loosely. She has just developed the habit of doing her business on the grass when we take her out for a wander. She won't go on gravel, cement or mulch in the garden but only on the grass. We just started by taking her out about four to five days after she ate which is when she would have normally soiled her enclosure. After a few months she developed the habit of waiting till she was on the grass to go. I even tested this theory by leaving her in her enclosure for longer than normal and she didn't soil her cage, but as soon as she started out on the grass up went her tail and out popped her pooh and wee. So I'm pretty sure she has developed a "habit" of waiting until she's on the grass. So maybe we can develop "habits" for them rather than call it "training"... Just my two cents worth anyway!
Enter your email address to join: