vet trip for the deccw

Aussie Pythons & Snakes Forum

Help Support Aussie Pythons & Snakes Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Did you have much warning this was going to happen..IMO i think this is great especially with the Broad headeds,they was a nice little population in Sydney years ago,however last year in the same spot,only found one..Looks as thou you have a few Jack..Do you have a breeding pair,have you had any success in breeding them..
 
This is only the beginning of DECCW's 'get tough on reptile keepers' program... and of course all it will do is make those that want to keep Broadies do it off licence. The more they 'enforce', the more keepers will find ways around these constraints. They might catch a few keepers of wild caught animals in the beginning, but things will settle back into the 'conceal and say nothing' phase after a short time.

There is a mood amongst a few individuals at DECCW that reptile keepers need to be pulled into line, but he notion of working cooperatively with reptile keepers is unknown in this country - better to treat us all like exploiting criminals and use a slegehammer when a tackhammer would do the job.

They just don't get it. Forcing keepers to risk the lives of their small animals, and to disfigure them with a big microchip, is not a good scenario.

Jamie.
 
They might catch a few keepers of wild caught animals in the beginning, but things will settle back into the 'conceal and say nothing' phase after a short time.


Jamie.
Sure they might catch a few keepers of wild caught animals. Who will that benefit? Certainly not the wild caught animals. It will generate yet another story of wild caught animals confiscated to then die from inadequate care.
 
I would expect there to be a minimum safe size for PIT tags - and 29g would be likely to be below that. I just boxed up some baby Darwins that weight and can't imagine trying to microchip them. Heck, my 36 kg rottie whimpered when getting tagged! I appreciate the need to conserve wild populations, but animal welfare must also be taken into account. Have you been provided with new record books now that all are individually tagged? I imagine that you would have to record the microchip numbers of all animals sold, traded, died, etc., plus keeping track of numbers in your possession. Won't that make the annual record fun?!
 
One things that bother me. Why taking blood samples? DNA can be easily extracted from a slough.
 
ohh geez,. poor things!
I hope they are all ok & not too stressed out from such an ordeal.
 
Is it only the NSW authorities doing this or are other states doing the same cooperatively? (haha yeah, right)

Are there many specimens kept outside of NSW anyway? Are those records any benefit if the Broadies were sold to someone interstate? I guess it would if those animals make it back to NSW at some stage, & I suppose DNA markers would identify any progeny imported back into the state.
 
I think it is a good idea to keep track of the population if it is actually threatened in the wild. Atleast they are doing something about it, and not just procrastinating. If nothing else, many people here now know about it (480 odd views on this post) through their indirect actions and people here are now more educated (Im sure many of you googled the species when he gave the name, i know i did). I am wondering why reptiles are not subject to the same laws as other animals like dogs and cats and it is manditory to tag. Populations and real time data would then be available for all to use. I have listened to the problems raised here with deaths etc. so there must be a better way to chip them, but without the numbers being done i would think it would be hard to change their minds with only limited info in hand.

Why would chipping drive people to the black market? I would assume keepers of this species would be breeding to sustain a captive population as it is a stressed wild population. If a black market does arise as a result will it be any diferent to every other species commonly available on the black market? None of those species are chipped but i reckon under the table sales still go on even with fairly common snakes like Diamonds.

cheers
 
how would you be garanteed that the slough came from the particular animal being tested?

I thought the authorities would trust us. :lol:

I got your point. They also clipped scales - why not use the clippings for DNA extraction?
Another concern, let say a clutch of BHSs turns up and there is some suspicion about their origins. Are they going to bleed new-born juveniles?
This whole exercise seems like a typical government project; lets do this and then see what we're going to do next. There are Broad-heads in Qld.
What's the name of the project? "Broad-heads controlled by Narrow-heards".

Monte, this whole idea of controlling the trade and even have some handle on relatedness is an impossible dream, because the technology is not there yet or is too expensive. PIT tags (mircochips) and far too big to be used on juvenile snakes, they can't be used at all on most geckos. Unless the PIT tag is implanted into the body cavity (which is a surgical procedure), it is easily removed and just as easily implanted subcutaneously into another snake. For argument sake, if a Tagged snakes dies, the owner catches replacement in the wild and inserts the old tag - no one ill know. That's where DNA comes into play but who is going to pay for all that, and most importantly, is it worth it? The authorities are flat out processing permits and, how they going to manage a DNA / PIT tag database and track transactions?
 
Last edited:
a close up photo was taken of the head pattern so that a replacement animal could not be used michael, they thought of that!
in regards to the microchip size, the vet told me an australian company has developed a so called "nanochip" but the DECCW wanted this done right away. To give you an idea of the timescale, I had an inspection where they turned up and went through my collection on the 21st of december, and i was handed a letter to comply with this procedure by the 24th!
thankfully i was granted an extension till after the xmas break when i returned from my holiday.
the DECCW has been using these same PIT tags on green and golden bell frogs 25mm sv!
I would love to know the fatality rate in this endangered frog and also from all the other wild broadies they have tagged, but they wouldnt admit to any deaths now would they...
 
I thought the authorities would trust us. :lol:

I got your point. They also clipped scales - why not use the clippings for DNA extraction?
Another concern, let say a clutch of BHSs turns up and there is some suspicion about their origins. Are they going to bleed new-born juveniles?
This whole exercise seems like a typical government project; lets do this and then see what we're going to do next. There are Broad-heads in Qld.
What's the name of the project? "Broad-heads controlled by Narrow-heards".

Monte, this whole idea of controlling the trade and even have some handle on relatedness is an impossible dream, because the technology is not there yet or is too expensive. PIT tags (mircochips) and far too big to be used on juvenile snakes, they can't be used at all on most geckos. Unless the PIT tag is implanted into the body cavity (which is a surgical procedure), it is easily removed and just as easily implanted subcutaneously into another snake. For argument sake, if a Tagged snakes dies, the owner catches replacement in the wild and inserts the old tag - no one ill know. That's where DNA comes into play but who is going to pay for all that, and most importantly, is it worth it? The authorities are flat out processing permits and, how they going to manage a DNA / PIT tag database and track transactions?

It's called empire building. Convince the community (and the political hand that feeds you) that there is a problem, even if there isn't, and it increases your chances of getting more staff and more money, to fix a problem that didn't exist in the first place, and can't really be fixed anyway until the habitat is protected... But it looks good for a bureaucrat to jump on a 'problem' and be seen to be doing something, even if there is no real possibility of any 'follow through' in future years.

No doubt there are a few BHSs moved around illegally, but the BHS is a small, slow growing and specialised elapid, and probably has very limited appeal in the larger reptile market, so the term 'black market' is probably a bit simplistic. Similarly, the 'black market' in Diamond Pythons would be limited for other reasons - there are so many attractive captive bred animals available at low cost that taking from the wild is rendered almost unnecessary if you're a licensed keeper. Those who are not in the licensing system will not alter their behaviour because the chances of them getting caught is remote.

The more things are put into law, the more people find ways around those laws. The only way any conservation effort will succeed is by cooperation with the interested community. This is not cooperative behaviour, it's threatening behaviour and the chance of it succeeding in its objectives in the long term is nil.

Jamie

I guess this is a bit off topic really Jack, for this thread (which I find very interesting...) but I'm sure members have seen my numerous negative comments about the various state bureaucracies over the years. My opinions are built on decades of experience with these departments (I used to work for one), and I am convinced that there MUST be a better way for them to behave, and to encourage cooperative responses from the keeping community with better outcomes for all, including the animal communities and habitats they wish to protect. Decades of this behaviour continue to produce miserable outcomes for the animals and the habitats, but they just don't get it. The exercise of power is far more important in the long run, and good outcomes don't produce good headlines.

At this point in time, they don't remotely care about the resentment they cause because they believe they have the force of the law behind them. Yours is a good case in point: why even try to insist that you have a procedure like this done within 3 days of an inspection? In regards to the inspection, you are perfectly within your rights, if they turn up unannounced for an 'inspection', to arrange with them a time which suits YOU - they have no automatic right of access to your home.

Outrageous, but so typical of the way reptile keepers, in particular, are treated... but only in Australia...

J
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's absolutely ridicules to PIT tag frogs. A few years ago a colleague of mine submitted application to the Animal Ethics Committee for his frog research. He proposed to use PIT tags instead of toe clipping but his proposed methodology was rejected with a detailed explanation why PIT tags should not be used for marking frogs. I guess the DECCW doesn't need AEC's approvals.

The original DEXTRON PIT tags used to travel under the skin but for at least the last 20 years, they have been coating the glass surface with a growth hormone. The connective tissues permanently encapsulated the tag within few hours.

It's fine, actually better to implant PIT tags rather than inject them under the skin (for obvious reasons) in larger species of adult snakes but not into the body cavity where it can interfere with internal organs. It's best placed along one rib (on the inside) where it doesn't affect the snakes locomotion but that means a few puffs of GA and skillful pair of hands.
 
can anyone give me the weight/size of one of those pit tags?
I'd like to know what % of body weight it equals
 
It weight less than 0.5 gram, probably much less, the Pesola scale (0.5g increments) didn't even move.
 
Last edited:
cheers Michael!

why cant they use a BIOMETRIX System-1000 photonic marking formulation like it was designed for?
this with a picture of the head pattern is more than enough to identify a snake
i see no need for a tag that size to be placed in an animal like that
 
I would say because it's easier to link PIT Tag number to a DNA database than a photograph.
 
BMX was designed to tag fish so i dont see why it cant work for this
if all you need is a number
 
I hear there are only 16 individual Broad Headed Snakes being kept on licence in NSW . And they are spread among 5 or 6 keepers . It puts broadies in a very precarious position in relation to their future in private hands . How many zoos have bred them? I know that some private keepers have cracked them but its not a regular occurence . It only takes one hot spell to coincide with a power outage ( aircon is critical for the captive maintenance of this species ) to kill off an adult . In a perfect world it would be nice if these remaining keepers 'share notes' and work together . It would give those at the DECCW a very large headache if they started to produce a large number of progeny every year !
 
I went to melbourne zoo last year and they said they had no trouble breeding them and infact werent breeding them the comming season as there is no where for the babies to go?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top