P
Pythoninfinite
Guest
I'm not sure where all this talk of courts came from? I thought we were working toward having political representation as a hobby. we might be more successful if instead of trying fight the government in court, where they have pretty much unlimited resources. We instead use political pressure to improve the licensing system. Either way I think we should be trying to start with the small problems and working toward the big ones.
1. 6 month transfer period reduced or removed
2. Caging requirements changed from "rules" to "guide lines only" or removed all together
imports/exports and being able to keep all species in all states are both issues that defiantly need to be fixed. They are very big issues tho that will take a lot of resources to achieve, it might be better if we try to get a few small wins under our belt that way the sceptics that are sitting on the side lines will see that it is working and will start to come on board before we tackle the big issues.
Actually governments don't have unlimited resources when it comes to litigation - they target the money they spend on court matters pretty much according to whether they will win or not (ie, money well spent), and like everybody these days, they have budget limits placed on their activities across all facets of their operations.
As far as equality between all states goes, island communities can (and in Tassie's case, I think should) claim special consideration with regard to the introduction of non-endemic species into their fragile ecosystems. This is my personal opinion of course, but I believe Tasmania should keep the ban on non-endemic reptiles in place, and the needs of a few Tasmanians who want to keep other species should not override the very sound reasons for keeping potentially harmful introductions out. If you want to keep other species, move to a place where you can - I left WA pretty much because of the restrictions in that state.
Changing the enclosure size rules in NSW is not a simple matter - they are now enshrined in law, and it is highly unlikely the Government will be compelled to revisit the matter anytime soon. I suspect that NSW has germinated a cancerous growth around this matter and it is likely to be looked at seriously by most jurisdictions in the country sometime soon. Given the response in NSW from keepers, I doubt that any consultation will take place before imposition of similar legislation elsewhere. But now is the time to lobby your state representatives on both sides, because Abbott has successfully destabilised even the state Liberal Governments, and they won't be looking too flash when it comes to reelection (yay!!!).
Champagne, sorry to do this (it's not personal !) but the word is "definitely," not "defiantly," which means something totally different.
- - - Updated - - -
G'day guys, for what it's worth I'd just like to say a big thank you to those that are giving their time to further our hobby/passion.
You definitely have my support and respect.
Communication is one of my many weak points (just ask wifey) so I'm not much good to you guys in the front line unfortunately. But it does seem clear to me that simply communicating this idea to the average herper is step number one in gaining support from them. Maybe that is one area where us average joes can help. As mentioned via herp clubs, notices in pet shops, person to person etc.
Maybe there needs to be a web site we can point people at that displays the goals and benefits?
Thanks for your support Steve! Have you filled in that drain across your driveway yet ?
Jamie
Last edited by a moderator: