Zoltag
Active Member
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2005
- Messages
- 290
- Reaction score
- 0
Hmm...
I must admit that I am very concerned about the idea of there being a legal rquirement for minimum enclosure size. Typically when legislation is passed that specifies very strict (draconian?) rules, there is a reason behind it - Either the department in question is looking to increase their importance / public profile with lots of high profile arrests / court cases, or they are targeting specific individuals who are not currently breaking any laws (think Al Capone ).
Either way, having rules that are excessive (as people are saying these dimensions will be) opens itself to abuse. Anyone who thinks that they will be alright and these laws really arent designed to catch them, but to protect the animals welfare is naive, to put it simply.
On the other hand, whinging about it in a forum is not the answer. What we should be doing is getting a coordinated focus group together to prepare something challenging the way the new draft is being put together (specifically for the DECC to be more transparent in what it is doing and allowing for a wider scope public consultation process). This needs to be done in a mature, professional manner and then submitted to Peter Garrett and if there is no response to that, then submitted to Greg Hunt. Combine that with a paper based petition of sufficient size and questions will start to flow in parliament and we may see some action happening around it.
If not, there is always the possibility of passing the same information to local MPs and hope that someone becomes interested enough in whats happening to kick up a stink.
If anyone is interested in getting together over this, PM me
I must admit that I am very concerned about the idea of there being a legal rquirement for minimum enclosure size. Typically when legislation is passed that specifies very strict (draconian?) rules, there is a reason behind it - Either the department in question is looking to increase their importance / public profile with lots of high profile arrests / court cases, or they are targeting specific individuals who are not currently breaking any laws (think Al Capone ).
Either way, having rules that are excessive (as people are saying these dimensions will be) opens itself to abuse. Anyone who thinks that they will be alright and these laws really arent designed to catch them, but to protect the animals welfare is naive, to put it simply.
On the other hand, whinging about it in a forum is not the answer. What we should be doing is getting a coordinated focus group together to prepare something challenging the way the new draft is being put together (specifically for the DECC to be more transparent in what it is doing and allowing for a wider scope public consultation process). This needs to be done in a mature, professional manner and then submitted to Peter Garrett and if there is no response to that, then submitted to Greg Hunt. Combine that with a paper based petition of sufficient size and questions will start to flow in parliament and we may see some action happening around it.
If not, there is always the possibility of passing the same information to local MPs and hope that someone becomes interested enough in whats happening to kick up a stink.
If anyone is interested in getting together over this, PM me