This comment makes no sense at all. A coastal can not morph into a diamond.
But isnt that essentially what has happened?...(though it is more likely they both "morphed" into coastals and diamonds from a common ancestor, it is also possible that diamonds evolved from coastals or vice-versa)...
Hence there being intergrades between coastal carpet pythons and diamond pythons...
What I dont get is how people can say hybrids are bad but intergrades are good, as they can be genetically identical animals...(which really makes the whole argument moot, because if intergrades exist in the wild, then how can you possibly make the distinction between intergrades and hybrids in captivity, as again, they are the same animal (the only way you could would be by keeping perfect breeding records and providing papers for every animal born - Which is probably not such a bad idea, for purebred animals of a distinct sub-species, though it would be a waste of time, effort and money for animals of mixed genetics))...
(For those that are confused, the difference between an intergrade and a hybrid is defined by
when they got the mix of genes that they have, not by
what those genes are...Basically, if you trace their family tree back to before the two distinct sub-species diverged and didnt find any animals that were one sub-species or the other, they are intergrades and if you did find such animals in their family history, they are hybrids (whether they are wild-bred or not)...Who knows, all of the wild "intergrades" might actually be hybrids, its just that humans didnt get around to classifying them before the animals of mixed genetics appeared on the scene)...