kawasakirider
Very Well-Known Member
I highlighted the first part of your post.I am basing my opinions on all the knowledge and fact we have available at present.
I will believe this until the day that something pops up that gives me a reason to think otherwise - I don't think that's naive at all.
Also, not intending to be rude, however, your comparison with cancer and AIDS is completely and utterly irrelevant.
.
AIDS and Cancer have nothing to do with the debate, but the point I was making is that you should never stop questioning, and experimenting, because even if it is unlikely, you never know unless you have a crack. So the comment wasn't irrelevant, it was just misconstrued.
I have also said that I'm inclined to agree with you, because I haven't seen anything to make me think otherwise. But until every option has been exhausted, no one can definitively come to a conclusion.
Please don't think I'm being rude.