ravensgait
Active Member
JP, I'll see if I can pull some info up and send it to you. But most the DNA work has just been mentioned in papers and post on Carpets and the like.. It is my understanding that not a lot has been done. There has been some talk of doing some work here in the states but the problem is that in most cases they can't be sure where the animals they are taking samples from originated , just one cross could make a mess of it..
There are the Morelia Spilota -- Spilota Spilota, Cheynei, Harrisoni, Mcdowelli ETC ETC then there is Morelai Bredli which seemed to be different enough to split off from Spilota .. I think we sometimes forget that these animals all have a common ancestor .
CR , I'm sure there is some difference but it doesn't seem to be that much. What is the differences you see between say a Coastal and a Jungle- Color, Markings and some size, not all that big a difference. When just looking at them and what little DNA work done doesn't find all that much difference. Sort of a scary thought what if next year some researcher decided to break them up even more and added say 10 more subspecies or 20 ! Many would say BS and still call them what they are today others would have a bunch more Spilota to play with.. We still call Green tree pythons Chondro's which was their name until someone decided to toss them into the Morelia yet we still call them Chondro's lol It's just people that break all this up not the snakes themselves..
And just to be clean I do not want to see them all lumped back into one subspecies.. Randy
There are the Morelia Spilota -- Spilota Spilota, Cheynei, Harrisoni, Mcdowelli ETC ETC then there is Morelai Bredli which seemed to be different enough to split off from Spilota .. I think we sometimes forget that these animals all have a common ancestor .
CR , I'm sure there is some difference but it doesn't seem to be that much. What is the differences you see between say a Coastal and a Jungle- Color, Markings and some size, not all that big a difference. When just looking at them and what little DNA work done doesn't find all that much difference. Sort of a scary thought what if next year some researcher decided to break them up even more and added say 10 more subspecies or 20 ! Many would say BS and still call them what they are today others would have a bunch more Spilota to play with.. We still call Green tree pythons Chondro's which was their name until someone decided to toss them into the Morelia yet we still call them Chondro's lol It's just people that break all this up not the snakes themselves..
And just to be clean I do not want to see them all lumped back into one subspecies.. Randy